IL-6 and D-Dimer at Admission Predicts Cardiac Injury and Early Mortality during SARS-CoV-2 Infection (preprint)

BACKGROUND We recently described mortality of cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients. Admission activation of immune, thrombotic biomarkers and their ability to predict cardiacinjury and mortality patterns in COVID-19 is unknown. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 170 COVID-19 patients with cardiac injury at admission to Tongji Hospital in Wuhan from January 29–March 8, 2020. Temporal evolution of inflammatory cytokines, coagulation markers, clinical, treatment and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS Of 170 patients, 60 (35.3%) died early (<21d) and 61 (35.9%) died after prolonged stay. Admission lab work that correlated with early death were elevate levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6) (p<0.0001), Tumor Necrosis Factor-a (TNF-a) (p=0.0025), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p<0.0001). We observed the trajectory of biomarker changes after admission, and determined that early mortality had a rapidly increasing D-dimer, gradually decreasing platelet and lymphocyte counts. Multivariate and simple linear regression models showed that death risk was determined by immune and thrombotic pathway activation. Increasing cTnI levels were associated with those of increasing IL-6 (p=0.03) and D-dimer (p=0.0021). Exploratory analyses suggested that patients that received heparin has lower early mortality compared to those who did not (p =0.07), despite similar risk profile. CONCLUSIONS In COVID-19 patients with cardiac injury, admission IL-6 and D-dimer predicted subsequent elevation of cTnI and early death, highlighting the need for early inflammatory cytokine-based risk stratification in patients with cardiac injury. Condensed Abstract COVID-19 with cardiac injury is associated with worse survival. Admission activation of immune, thrombotic biomarkers and their ability to predict cardiac injury and mortality patterns in COVID-19 is unknown. This study proved that cardiac injury in these patients is closely related to the activation of immunological and thrombotic pathways and can be predicted by admission biomarkers of these pathways. This study supports the strategy of biomarker-guided, point-of-care therapy that warrants further studies in a randomized manner to develop anti-immune and anti-thrombotic treatment regimens in severe COVID-19 patients with cardiac injury.

Modulation of Cardiac Injury by ACE inhibitor/ARB in Patients with Severe COVID-19 (preprint)

Introduction: Cardiac injury occurs in 7-22% of patient hospitalized with COVID-19 and an elevation in troponin is associated with a 4.2-fold increase in the risk of mortality. Preliminary data showed ACEi/ARB usage might not increase mortaily in COVID-19 patients. However, it is unknown if cardiac injury in patients with severe COVID-19 can be modulated by ACEi/ARB usage during evolution of the cardiac injury.Methods: In 154 COVID-19 patients with cardiac injury, the effect of ACEi/ARB treatment (17 patients) was compared with 137 patients without ACEi/ARB treatment. Cardiac injury was indicated by cTnI level.Results: In ACEi/ARB treatment group and no ACEi/ARB treatment group, peak cTnI level did not show significant difference (150.5 pg/ml [31.75-1179], vs 207 pg/ml [54.65-989.4], respectively, P = 0.21). Evolution of Cardiac injury (temporal change of cTnI at day 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, and 33) showed no statistical difference. Mortality (ACEi/ARB group vs no ACEi/ARB group; 52.9% vs 69.9%, P = 0.17), atrial arrhythmias (11.7% vs 24.4%, P = 0.36), requirement for invasive ventilatory support (29.4% vs 48.2%, P = 0.14) also showed no significant difference in two groups.Conclusions: ACEi/ARB usage during the COVID-19 was not associated with exacerbation of cardiac injury. These data should be interpreted as essentially hypothesis-generating due to small sample size.Clinical Trial Registration: This retrospective study was registered in Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR 2000031301).